FREE SUBSCRIPTION Includes: The Advisor Daily eBlast + Exclusive Content + Professional Network Membership: JOIN NOW LOGIN
Skip Navigation LinksHome / News / Read News

Print

CIT Examines the Small Twin-Aisle Aircraft Market

March 18, 2014, 06:04 AM
Filed Under: Aircraft

A maturing small twin-aisle aircraft market presents challenges and opportunities for Airbus as it considers the future of its A330 aircraft, according to Steve Mason, Vice President of Aircraft Analysis, CIT Aerospace at CIT Group. These views and others are presented in “The Small Twin-Aisle Market: What’s Next?”, the latest piece of market intelligence to be featured in the CIT Executive Insights series.

Small Twin-Aisle Aircraft Market Outlook

Since the introduction of the Boeing 767 in 1982 and Airbus’ A330 in 1994, the small twin-aisle aircraft segment has been an area of strength for these aircraft manufacturers. “For Airbus and Boeing, the 250- to 400-seat twin-aisle market has proven successful, especially compared with the commoditized single-aisle market and the unpredictable very large aircraft (VLA) market,” says Mason.

Mason adds that CIT recently analyzed the capacity requirements of the 250- to 300-seat market, commenting, “We concluded that between 2018 and 2021, major U.S. trunk carriers, Asian carriers throughout the continent, especially in China, along with major European carriers will need additional capacity in this seat market.”

The A330 at a Crossroads

Airbus continues to invest in the A330 and plans to introduce its longer-range 242T MTOW version in 2015, for which CIT is proud to be the launch customer. However, Airbus faces important decisions as the A330 airframe ages and the market evolves.

“Twenty years after its introduction, the A330 is at a crossroads,” says Mason. “The aircraft is not selling as well as Airbus would like, and the question now facing both the company and its customers is what options remain for the A330 and, for that matter, the entire 250- to 300-seat market.”

Choices for Airbus

According to Mason, Airbus has four principal options for the A330: do nothing and cede market share in this segment; introduce small tweaks, such as incremental improvements in engine efficiency; rely on a “shrink” version of the larger A350-800 to cover this market segment; or implement substantial changes to the aircraft.

“Rather than tweaking the design, Airbus could invest in a major overhaul that would undoubtedly include new engines,” says Mason. “Engine manufacturers are pushing Airbus to consider existing engine designs for a new A330 – dubbed the A330neo, or ‘new engine option’ – that could benefit both Airbus and the engine manufacturers.”

The Best Option: Finding Additional Value for the A330

Mason believes that the best option for Airbus is to invest in improvements to the A330 that add value and extend the life of the airframe. “While the A330’s sales may be trailing off, the plane remains one of the workhorses of the Airbus fleet,” says Mason. “The company’s best option for combating declining sales and maintaining market share against rising competition from Boeing is to pursue its options for extending the life of the aircraft. We believe Airbus can design a modified A330 that is competitive, and that best serves the interests of its customers and shareholders.”
 







Comments From Our Members

You must be an Equipment Finance Advisor member to post comments. Login or Join Now.